April 2007

Home Join PPP Feedback Site Map 

 

   



Organization USA
Asif Zardari
Free  E-Books
Latest News
Articles
Speeches
Press Release
Chronology
Local Activities
Achievements
Party Structure
Party Manifestos
History
Corruption Stories
Constitution
PPP VS Govt.
Photo Gallery
PPP CIS
PPP Youth
Links

 

News Archives

Latest News

January 2008

December 2007

November 2007

October 2007

September 2007

August 2007

July 2007

June 2007

May 2007

March 2007

February 2007

January 2007

December 2006

November 2006

October 2006

September 2006

August 2006

July 2006

June 2006

May 2006

April 2006

March 2006

February 2006

January 2006

December 2005

November 2005

October 2005

September 2005

August 2005

July 2005

June 2005

May 2005

April 2005

March 2005

February 2005

January 2005

December 2004

 

 

The Rediff Interview/Benazir Bhutto
 

 

 

April 2007

PPP rejects Bannu Bye election
Urges CEC to cancel results of polls and hold fresh election


Islamabad, April 2, 2007: The PPPP has rejected the results of the bye election on 29 March to the National Assembly seat in Bannu N-A 26 and demanded of the Election Commission to cancel the results and hold fresh elections.

In a statement today provincial PPP President Rahim Dad Khan said that acts of intimidation, rigging and bogus voting in the bye election to get elected his son the Frontier Chief Minister had broken all previous records and were not acceptable.

He said that the process of rigging was set in motion when the provincial government first had the elections postponed by a few weeks only to enable the son of the Chief Minister to attain the age as he was not eligible to take part in elections under the prevalent law.

A network of some 30 civil society organizations that is accredited with the Election Commission to monitor the polls has also in its preliminary report said that the elections were marred by serious irregularities. Massive use of local government machinery, lax enforcement of election laws, bogus ballots used in women polling stations, coercion and intimidation and defective voters’ lists have marred the by polls in NA-26, according to the initial report of the Fair and Free election Network (FAFEN) made public on Sunday.

Rahim Dad Khan said that a Taliban like atmosphere was created just before the elections intimidating people from coming to the polling stations. Armed and bearded men roamed the city in pick ups and vans to create an artificial impression of Taliban having taken over the city and sounding warning against participation in polls, he said.

Staff at the women polling stations was held hostage to enable the administration cast fake and bogus votes, he said. The polling agents of opponents were beaten and thrown out of the polling stations by people who were pretending to be Taliban.

He said that according to all independent observers the actual turn out was no more than 9%. However, in the afternoon polling stations were occupied by relatives of CM and the district nazim accompanied with police officials. The bogus votes cast during the occupations swelled the vote count of the Chief Minister’s son to the unbelievable figure of over 85,000 votes, he said.

He said that before the election the Chief Minister himself threatened the concerned polling staff and officers that his son must be given 80,000 votes. About 60 polling staff protested and refused to declare bogus election results but were later pressurized by the administration to fall in line.

Rahim Dad Khan said that due to massive rigging people will lose all faith in democratic institutions which will have a serious backlash. He said that the 1971 crisis was the result of denying the people the right to choose their own government and had played havoc with the federation.

The PPP leader called upon the Election Commissioner to cancel the by election of NA-26 and order fresh polls in the constituency.

Mohtarma Bhutto condemns cancellation of special bogies for Larkana bound Party workers

Demands immediate withdrawal of cancellation order
Mohtarma Bhutto condemns cancellation of special bogies for Larkana bound Party workers

Demands immediate withdrawal of cancellation order


Islamabad April 1, 2007: Former Prime Minister and Chairperson of the Pakistan Peoples Party Mohtarma Benazir Bhutto has condemned the Punjab government decision to cancel the booking of special train bogies to carry PPP workers to Larkana for the barsi function on April 4 and demanded that the decision be immediately reversed.

Hundreds of PPP workers today gathered at the Railway Station Lahore to board the special bogies they had already booked for Larkana were shocked to learn that the reservation of bogies had been cancelled by the Punjab government without reason and without intimation.

The PPP workers gathered today at the Lahore Railway Station to take the train for Larkana to participate in the barsi function of Shaheed Zulfikar Ali Bhutto that is held every year on April 4 in the home town of former Prime Minister to pay homage to him and to renew their pledge to uphold the principles for which he laid down his life. However, after waiting for sometime the workers were told that the special reservations had been cancelled and asked to vacate the Railway Station.

In a statement today the former Prime Minister said that the cancellation of reserved booking was an act of political vendetta and only showed how fearful the Punjab administration was of the PPP. “Through such highhandedness and policy of coercion and intimidation of political workers the PML-Q wanted to set up a one Party rule in the country”.

Mohtarma Bhutto called upon the administration to immediately restore the train reservations and allow the workers to travel to Larkana for participation in the barsi function.

The former Prime Minister also urged the human rights bodies to raise their voice against this blatant attack on the basic rights of the people.

She also complimented the workers for their courage and steadfastness in turning up in large numbers to proceed to Larkana for the function. “Your sacrifices and sufferings will not go in vain”, she said.

Mohtarma Bhutto also directed Party leadership and senior lawyers to rush to the Railway Station and take up the matter with relevant.

Mohtarma Bhutto demands release of all activists
Says state repression cannot stifle the voice of people


Islamabad March 31, 2007: Former Prime Minister and Chairperson of the Pakistan Peoples party Mohtarma Benazir Bhutto has expressed grave concern over the continued detention of Party activists arrested in the wake of peaceful protest demonstrations and demanded their immediate release from captivity.

“The continued detentions of peaceful activists in jails in different parts of the country is a manifestation of the policy of political vendetta and is condemned”, she said in a statement today.

A number of PPP and ARD activists who were arrested last week in the week of protests by the bar against the suspension of Chef Justice have since been shifted to jails in far off places in Punjab to keep them away from their families. The activists sent to Attock, Sahiwal, Lahore and Adiyala jails include Khalid Nawaz Bobi, PSF President Punjab, Sardar Shaukat Hayat, Ex-President Rawalpindi Bar Association, Sultan Mahmood Qazi, Iqbal Razzaq Butt, Maqbool Ahmed Khan, Agha Ttaimur, Tariq Bin besides several nazims of Rawalpindi and many other activists.

Mohtarma Bhutto said that the detention of these activists was without reasons and unlawful and demanded that they be released immediately.

She complimented the party workers for staging peaceful demonstrations and for not getting provoked on the face of state repression.

She expressed concern over the issuance of blank detention orders by Punjab administration to police officials to arrest workers of the ARD before the 3rd of April. Nearly two hundred Party activists are still facing raids by the state agencies to apprehend them.

Mohtarma Bhutto demanded that the illegal detention orders be also withdrawn immediately. “State repression has never been able to stifle the voice of the masses”, she said.

Mohtarma Bhutto calls for imbibing love and humility on Eid-i-Milad
 


Islamabad, March 31, 2007: Former Prime Minister and Chairperson of the Pakistan Peoples Party Mohtarma Benazir Bhutto has greeted the people on the auspicious eve of Eid-i-Milad-un-Nabi and prayed for guidance to follow the teachings of the Holy Prophet (Peace be upon him).

Following is the text of her message on the occasion.

"On the auspicious day of the birth of the Holy Prophet (peace be upon
him) I send my greetings to every one particularly to the Muslims throughout the world and in Pakistan. I also pray that Allah give us the wisdom and guide us on the path to dedicate ourselves to the teachings of the Holy Prophet (peace be upon him) and rekindle our souls with the light lit by him.

"The Prophet (peace be upon him) brought a message of peace, love, compassion and humility. He preached tolerance and understanding. He also taught us to fight against tyranny, injustice and oppression. The need for imbibing all these virtues is as great today as it was at any time before. Let us therefore bow our heads in reverence to allow the clear light of his teachings illumine our path and transform our lives.

"Muhammad (Peace be upon him) was sent by Allah to the entire mankind indeed for the entire universe. That is why he was given the title of Rahmatulil-Aalamin, the benefactor of the entire universe. Since he was for all ages and all climes, homage is paid to him everywhere and at all times. It is therefore against the spirit of his teachings if any one individual or single school of thought sought to monopolize the Prophet’s (peace be upon him) teachings or sought to force any exclusive interpretation of it”.
 

Mohtarma Bhutto slams maltreatment of Sajida Mir

Maltreatment and humiliation of women had exposed regime’s claims of moderation


Islamabad April 1, 2007: Former Prime Minister and Chairperson of the Pakistan Peoples Party Mohtarma Benazir Bhutto has condemned the victimization of and maltreatment of Presidnet Women Wing PPP Lahore Sajid Mmir and said that the treatment meted out to Sajida had exposed the double standards of the regime behind the façade of so called enlightened moderation.

President Women Wing of PPP Lahore was slapped by the SHO while she was addressing a Union Council meeting in connection with the party
elections before being arrested. For three days Sajida Mir and her
sister were kept in a police station before formally detaining her under MPO and shifted to Kot Lakhpat jail. Her family members were not allowed to meet. At midnight Sajida was asked to board a police van and whisked to Mianwali jail without escort of lady police.

The PPP women wing leader has been in jail because of her very vocal protests against dictatorial polices of the military regime.

In a statement today Chairperson Mohtarma Benazir Bhutto said that the maltreatment of Sajida Mir was shocking and demanded that those responsible for it must be brought to book.

“The arrest of Sajida Mir and deliberately inflicting upon her torture and humiliation is a cheap tactic to send warning signals to political activists with a view to imposing one party rule in the country”, she said.

Mohtarma Bhutto warned that brutal repression of pro-democracy activists would result in backlash that could endanger undermine the unity and integrity of the federation.

“Political activists must not be pushed too hard with their backs to the wall”.

Mohtarma Bhutto demanded that a judicial inquiry must be held in the manhandling of Sajida Mir and those responsible be brought to justice according to the law of the land.

She also urged the human rights bodies to raise their voice against attempts to impose one Party rule in the country.

She said that the Party activists were men and women of great courage and conviction who are not deterred by such strong arm tactics.

Pakistan: US ally, US dilemma

Howard LaFranchi Staff writer of The Christian Science Monitor Date: 04/01/2007

WASHINGTON - Ever since the 9/11 attacks, Pakistan's President Pervez


Musharraf has doggedly made the case to Washington that he is the finger in the dike holding back a wave of Islamic extremism that could again reach America's shores.

Having successfully argued his own indispensability, General Musharraf has reaped billions of dollars in economic aid and arms sales – while encountering little challenge from Washington over his backsliding from steps toward democratic rule.

But now it is political protest, fueled by Musharraf's steps to consolidate and extend his power, that is washing over Pakistan. And that is presenting the US with a classic dilemma of the war on terrorism: Does a key leader's security value outweigh his authoritarian practices, and when does democratic rule become the greater guarantor of security?

Earlier this month, Musharraf suspended the country's Supreme Court chief justice. Ever since, Pakistan's middle classes – ironically one of the chief beneficiaries of the military leader's eight-year rule – have taken to the streets. Also fueling the uproar are suspicions that Musharraf is paving the way to another term as both president and chief military leader.

The protests are prompting concern, both in Pakistan and the US, that pent-up political frustrations and social stagnation threaten the stability of a key American ally at least as much as Islamic extremism in the country's less-advanced regions.

"For too long, we've heard that the only alternative to Musharraf is something worse. But the fact is we don't need him if he doesn't move towards a civilianized government with broadened representation of Pakistan's people," says Selig Harrison, director of the Asia program of the Center for International Policy in Washington. The lack of political reform and civilian rule has exacerbated divisions, he says, "and the more polarized Pakistan is, the more unstable it's going to be.

While no one expects the social unrest to cause Musharraf's imminent demise, many observers do see the coming months as crucial to Pakistan's direction.

"This is not just a flare-up. It is reflective of a broader discontent about the failure of the Musharraf regime to take concrete steps to restore civilian rule," says Karl Inderfurth, a former assistant secretary of State for south Asian affairs. "With elections on the horizon, this could be an important turning point."

Musharraf cited "abuse of power" when he suspended Chief Justice Iftikhar Muhammed Chaudhry on March 9, and many Pakistanis agreed – with the charge at least, though they attached it to the president himself. Mr. Chaudhry had taken the government to task over hundreds of disappearances of Pakistanis, some suspected Islamic extremists but others human rights activists and representatives of ethnic minority populations.

Perhaps more telling for many Pakistanis, Chaudhry had also expressed his view that it was not legal under the Constitution for Musharraf to seek another presidential term while remaining the Army chief. In addition, he had said publicly that he anticipated a number of ways in which the issue could come before him.

Such open threats to the continued reign of Pakistan's military became intolerable, says Mr. Harrison. "The military establishment is deeply involved in a wide range of business in the country, and they have a big stake in staying in power," he says.

So far, the Bush administration has trod lightly on the political uproar. It has expressed concern over some clashes that have turned violent but has reiterated support for Musharraf as a valuable ally in the war on terror.

But even there, cracks are beginning to show. Last month, in what some Pakistanis called the "tough love" visit, Vice President Dick Cheney made a surprise call on Musharraf to warn him that he risked losing support in the United States unless he took tougher steps against the Taliban and Al Qaeda. The Afghan government has pressed the US for months to get tough with Musharraf over the border issue.

Additional pressure is now coming from Congress, where several moves are afoot to set conditions for US support. Democratic senators John Kerry, Joseph Biden, and Christopher Dodd have introduced a resolution calling for US military assistance to Pakistan to "correlate" to Pakistan's efforts to strike Taliban and Al Qaeda bases on its territory. The House has already adopted even tougher legislation.

The Pakistani military in particular would seem to have good reason to worry about any threat to US military assistance. A study by the Center for Public Integrity in Washington shows that military aid to Pakistan grew from under $10 million in the three years prior to 9/11 to more than $4 billion in the three years after.

Musharraf's approach to the tribal regions along the Afghan border has been to pursue accords with local leaders to deny sanctuary to foreign fighters taking refuge there. The third such accord was signed this week, with some experts suggesting the approach is showing the first signs of results. Critics, however, believe the approach is more reflective of the close ties between Islamists andPakistan's intelligence services, as well as Musharraf's own ambiguous relations with Islamist forces.

Some experts see an Iran factor in US reluctance to turn the screws on Musharraf. "There's probably more than meets the eye on the administration's resistance to pushing for civilianization in Pakistan," says Harrison. "It is clear we are undertaking covert operations in Iran from Pakistan, aiding disaffected minorities there," he says. "And we have an undetermined agenda with Iran that could include military action at some point down the road, and we would need Pakistan for that."

Still, some see unrest in Pakistan's middle classes as a bigger long-term worry, and they say the US is going to have to take a firmer stand on democratization.

"US policy must be clear that Musharraf can only be elected again as a civilian, and that he must open up to the opposition parties," says Manjeet Kripalani, a fellow at the Council on Foreign Relations in New York.

But others echo the State Department stance, saying the US won't get very far issuing orders. "What we can do is present the case for why this is in their interest," says Mr. Inderfurth, now director of graduate international-affairs studies at George Washington University. "We can make the case that if he does not respond to the calls all around him [for political reform], Musharraf risks losing many of the considerable gains he has accomplished."

PML-N apathetic to ARD reorganisation, Fahim tells BB



ISLAMABAD: In a telephone talk on Friday, Pakistan People’s Party (PPP) Vice Chairman Makhdoom Amin Fahim complained to party’s Chairwoman Benazir Bhutto about the indifference of the Pakistan Muslim League-Nawaz (PML-N) towards the reorganisation of the Alliance for the Restoration of Democracy (ARD), Daily Times has learnt.

Fahim, who heads ARD, also complained to Ms Bhutto about the presence of only two PML-N leaders at an ARD meeting in Islamabad a day ago. He asked Ms Bhutto to formally take up these issues with PML-N chief Nawaz Sharif.

Sources quoted Fahim as telling his exiled leader that the PML-N appeared to be more interested in collaborating with the Muttahida Majlis-e-Amal for an anti-Musharraf movement than organising the ARD at provincial and divisional levels. He also said that the PPP had ensured participation of its all provincial presidents in Thursday’s ARD meeting. But, he said, only two PML-N leaders, Raja Zafarul Haq and Syed Zafar Ali Shah turned up at the meeting and they too showed no interest in the ARD reorganisation. He said such indifference by the PML-N could weaken the ARD. Fahim called the ARD meeting on Thursday to discuss alliance’s reorganisation, but it could not discuss the matter after the PML-N leaders expressed ignorance about the agenda.

PPP won’t join hands with MMA in protests
By Zulfiqar Ghuman


ISLAMABAD: The Pakistan People’s Party (PPP) has reiterated to the Pakistan Muslim League-Nawaz (PML-N) that it will not join hands with the Muttahida Majlis-e-Amal (MMA) in the protest campaign against the suspension of chief justice of Pakistan (CJP) or any other anti-government movement, Daily Times has learnt.

“The PPP also complained of the poor participation of the PML-N in the meeting of the Alliance for Restoration of Democracy (ARD) at the PPP’s Central Secretariat despite clear instructions by Nawaz Sharif. All our senior leaders, including provincial presidents, participated,” said a senior PPP leader on condition of anonymity after an ARD meeting on Thursday. The PPP leader said PML-N Chairman Raja Zafarul Haq, who represented his party along with Syed Zafar Ali Shah, told the meeting that they had informed all the senior leaders of the party about the meeting, but could not justify their absence.

“The PML-N leader also complained that Ms Bhutto was not attending the PML-N sponsored all parties conference in London. The PPP leaders told him that Ms Bhutto had decided to send a delegation to attend the APC despite the fact that it was called without taking them into confidence,” he said. The PPP leader said that they also told the PML-N to consult the PPP before important decisions. “However, we have told them that the PPP has no objection to the PML-N’s contacts with MMA,” the leader said.

Some 40 political leaders belonging to different components of the ARD attended the meeting. However, the original agenda of ARD organisation at the divisional level could not be taken up because the PML-N was unprepared. The PML-N claimed that its was not intimated about the agenda, while the PPP insisted that it had informed all its ARD partners. ARD Chairman and PPPP President Makhdoom Amin Fahim, speaking at a later press conference, reiterated the opposition’s support for the lawyers struggle against the removal of the CJP and promised full ARD participation in a protest on April 3 in front of the Supreme Court.

He also urged other opposition parties to participate in the protest on April 3 to express solidarity with the suspended CJP, but skipped questions regarding joint protests by all opposition parties including the MMA. “The ARD, MMA and PONM are three different political alliances and they take their own decisions,” he said.

 

PML-N invitation to MMA for ARD demo angers PPP
By Tahir Hasan Khan


KARACHI: The participation of the Muttahida Majlis-e-Amal (MMA) in the protest lodged by the Alliance for the Restoration of Democracy (ARD) for the restoration of Chief Justice of Pakistan would be tabled as the main item at the meeting of the central leaders of the ARD being held in Islamabad on Thursday (today).

Disclosing this, sources said that the PPP leadership has already decided to take up this matter at the ARD meeting by lodging strong protest against former prime minister Mian Nawaz Sharif’s PML-N for inviting the MMA in the ARD protest.

Sources said that Benazir Bhutto has taken serious notice of the participation of the MMA leaders in ARD rallies and directed the party leaders to take up this matter in protest at the ARD meeting in the federal capital.

Insiders claimed that the PPP leadership had already lodged strong protest with the PML-N leaders for inviting the religious alliance in the ARD protest. The PPP leaders, sources said, had already conveyed to the PML-N that Benazir’s stand against the MMA was very clear as the party did not like to sit in any meeting or protest with the religious alliance owing to their policies.

The PPP has also conveyed that the ARD would be welcoming the MMA if the religious alliance quits the Balochistan government’s coalition with the ruling PML-Q.

The party leaders pointed out that the Sindh PML-N leader Zain Ansari admitted that he had invited the MMA on the instructions of his party leader Raja Zafarul Haq, who had asked him to invite the MMA leadership in the ARD protest demo.

According to sources, PML-N’s Secretary General Zafar Iqbal Jhagra is the main leader of the ARD in Pakistan after Makhdoom Amin Fahim but Raja Zafarul Haq enjoys no position in the ARD.

The MMA leaders had also planned their protest on the same day fixed by the ARD leaders Benazir Bhutto and Nawaz Sharif to press the demand for the restoration of Chief Justice Iftikhar Chaudhry.

The ARD and MMA had earlier announced separate venues for their protests but at the last moment the MMA joined the ARD protest in Karachi and other parts of the country.

The PPP sources said that Benazir Bhutto had refused to participate in the multi parties conference (MPC) convened by the PML-N chief Nawaz Sharif because she did not want to sit with the MMA leaders. The PML-N had also invited the MMA in its MPC in London but the conference was later postponed due to the stand of the PPP chairperson.


ARD meeting ends without decision
By Amir Wasim


ISLAMABAD: A meeting of the Alliance for the Restoration of Democracy (ARD) here on Thursday ended without taking any decision owing to differences between two main components — the People's Party Parliamentarians and the Pakistan Muslim League (Nawaz) — over the agenda, sources at the two parties told Dawn.

According to the PPP leaders, the meeting of the heads of alliance’s component parties had been convened to discuss the reorganisation of the ARD at the provincial and district levels, while the PML-N leaders claimed that they were told that the meeting had been called to discuss the prevailing political situation in the country, with particular reference to the ongoing judicial crisis.

The PPP sources told Dawn that the party had directed all its provincial presidents, information secretaries and other office-bearers to attend the ARD meeting to finalise a plan for reorganising the ARD at the provincial and district levels in the light of decisions taken at a meeting between Benazir Bhutto and Nawaz Sharif in London last week.

They said all top leaders of the PPP and office-bearers from three provinces were present in the meeting. They regretted that from the PML-N side only chairman Raja Zafarul Haq and vice-president Syed Zafar Ali Shah attended the meeting.

The sources said the PML-N leaders told ARD chairman Makhdoom Amin Fahim and other PPP leaders that they were not aware of the agenda of the meeting and had come there without any preparation. The sources said the PPP leaders expressed displeasure over this reply and said the PML-N was not taking practical steps to strengthen the ARD.

A PPP leader alleged that the PML-N had failed to bring its office-bearers to the ARD meeting because it was facing some internal organisational problems.

A senior PML-N leader said the Thursday's meeting had been convened by alliance chairman Makhdoom Amin Fahim without any consultation with the PML-N. He said the PML-N was not aware of any decision taken in the Nawaz-Benazir meeting regarding reorganisation of the ARD.

Replying to a question, he said PML-N secretary-general Iqbal Zafar Jhagra was present in the London meeting but he had not communicated any such decision to them. He said the PML-N was an organised party and had office-bearers all over the country and it was wrong to say that the party was facing any organisational crisis. He said it was good to know that the PPP had realised the need for reorganising the ARD after seven years.

Meanwhile, briefing the media after the meeting, Makhdoom Amin Fahim said that they had decided to hold a protest demonstration from the ARD platform outside the Supreme Court on April 3 -- the day Chief Justice Iftikhar Mohammad Chaudhry would appear before the Supreme Judicial Council.


Words of Shaheed

Zulfiqar Ali Bhutto

There was a great Prime Minister, the first Prime Minister, the father of the present Prime Minister of India, who said, "We were too old, we were too tired to oppose Pakistan, and Pakistan had to come into being. But we hope that one day we will get together gain." I too hope so, not that Pakistan will emerge as subservient to India but in the sense that we will get together again as equal friends, in a common fraternity, living in a common subcontinent and sharing the common effort of seeing that poverty, ignorance and misery are wiped out. If there are any two countries in world that are the poorest in the world, they are Pakistan and India. Our resources might be tremendous, but the fact is that we two are the poorest in the world. Yet in the last 24 years, we have gone to war three times. Three times there has been conflict in the subcontinent. I remember that Prime Minister of the Soviet Union once telling me that even rich nations try to avoide war; poorer nations should make a greater attempt to avoid war.

Speech at the Security Council, New York

December 12, 1971

 



HOME

Copyright © 2004-07 PPP USA. All rights reserved